3.6 Million Year-Old Footprints
|
Olduwai Gorge |
OLDAVAI GORGE, TANZANIA: I learned from
the plague in the small museum that in 1976 members of Mary Leakey’s paleontological
team were just fooling around, throwing dried elephant dung at each other, when
one of the members ducked, slipped, and hit the ground. As he did, he noticed
the clear indentations of animal prints in the hard surface. The team knew that at
this level of the Gorge the footprints had to be over three million years old
due to the unique feature of the Gorge in which over millions of years
intermittent volcanic eruptions had created four clearly identifiable
geological layers that can now be tied to specific periods in time. Through the
Gorge’s successive levels paleontologists have continued to discover the remains
of prehistoric hominid species and their artifacts that aptly demonstrate the
evolution of humankind. Leakey’s team removed the sand from the animal footprints
only to find footprints that looked very human like. These footprints they
determined had to have been that of Australopithecus Afrarensi; the same specie
of hominid as that of Lucy found in Ethiopia in 1974, whose skull is about the
size of an ape. Therefore, paleontologists theorize the footprints
demonstrate that bipedalism predated the evolution of other human-like
characteristics like large brain size. Concerned over preserving a record of
what they had discovered, Leakey’s team created a plaster cast of the
footprints, which are now on display in the museum. “But where are the actual footprints?” I asked my guide. “They’re forty-five kilometers from here, but
you can’t see them, because they’re buried.” After making the cast, the
Leakey’s team had buried them to preserve them for future generations. This,
however, they soon found wasn’t such a good idea, as plants started to take
root that would eventually destroy the imprints. Efforts are now being taken to
ensure that that doesn’t happen. “But
wait,” I asked my guide. “Why cover
them up at all? Why not build a museum around the footprints that would
preserve them while actually allowing future generations to view them?” “Don’t
know,” my guide responded. A nearby tourist, who appeared quite knowledgeable
on the subject, said, “The cost/benefit
analysis simply doesn’t support it.”